|
Overall picture
on caseload and disposal at all Court levels |
 |
|
| |
 |
 |
Obscene Articles Tribunal |
|
|
 |
CASELOAD AND CASE DISPOSAL OF THE OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL |
|
| |
| |
|
Caseload |
Disposal* |
| |
|
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
 |
Articles for determination
|
22
916 |
76
929 |
69
055 |
25
340 |
76
623 |
69
596 |
|
Articles for classification
|
1
746 |
1
766 |
1
157 |
1
747 |
1
755 |
1
159 |
|
Articles for review
|
8 |
16 |
9 |
4 |
15 |
0 |
|
Articles for reconsideration
|
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
| |
Total |
24
670 |
78
714 |
70
221 |
27
092 |
78
396 |
70
755 |
|
| * |
Case disposal refers to those
articles which have been determined or classified;
those in respect of which determination or classification
is not required with consent of both parties; and
those in respect of which determination or classification
have been reviewed or reconsidered |
|
| |
 |
|
|
WAITING TIME
FOR CASES IN THE OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL |
|
| |
| |
|
Waiting
Times (days) |
| |
|
Target |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
|
From referral by a magistrate
to commencement of determination of the subject
matter of a court case
|
21 |
15 |
19 |
17 |
|
From receipt of application
to classification
|
5 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
From receipt of application
to review
|
35 |
21 |
27 |
26 |
|
From receipt of application
to reconsideration
|
35 |
- |
32 |
- |
|
| * |
As there is no application for reconsideration filed for 2005 and 2007, the waiting time is inapplicable |
|
| |
|
|
