Overall picture
on caseload and disposal at all Court levels
Obscene Articles Tribunal
CASELOAD AND CASE DISPOSAL OF THE OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL
| |
|
Caseload |
Disposal* |
| |
|
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
| - |
Articles for determination
|
22 916 |
76 929 |
69 055 |
25 340 |
76 623 |
69 596 |
| - |
Articles for classification
|
1 746 |
1 766 |
1 157 |
1 747 |
1 755 |
1 159 |
| - |
Articles for review
|
8 |
16 |
9 |
4 |
15 |
0 |
| - |
Articles for reconsideration
|
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
| |
Total |
24
670 |
78
714 |
70
221 |
27
092 |
78
396 |
70
755 |
| * |
Case disposal refers to those
articles which have been determined or classified;
those in respect of which determination or classification
is not required with consent of both parties; and
those in respect of which determination or classification
have been reviewed or reconsidered |
WAITING TIME
FOR CASES IN THE OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL
| |
|
Waiting
Times (days) |
| |
|
Target |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
| - |
From referral by a magistrate to commencement
of determination of the subject matter of a court case
|
21 |
15 |
19 |
17 |
| - |
From receipt of application to classification
|
5 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
| - |
From receipt of application to review
|
35 |
21 |
27 |
26 |
| - |
From receipt of application to reconsideration
|
35 |
- |
32 |
- |
| * |
As there is no application for reconsideration
filed for 2005 and 2007 (as at September), the waiting
time is inapplicable |
|