Click to enter Hong Kong Judiciary Home PageEnglish繁體中文简体中文
Home
Review of 2016
Highlights of events in 2016
List of Judges and Judicial Officers
Caseload, Case Disposal and Waiting Time at Different Court Levels
Membership list of the Civil Justice Reform Monitoring Committee
Membership list of the Working Party on Mediation
Membership list of the Court Users' Committees
Membership list of the Judicial Studies Board
Judiciary Administration
Judicial Training
Number of Visits and Vistors to the Judiciary
Expenditure and Revenue of the Judiciary in 2015-2016
Complaints Against Judges and Judicial Officers
Complaints Against the Judiciary Administration
Photo Gallery
Printer friendly version
for this page|for whole report
Complaints against Judges and Judicial Officers
 
Number of Complaints Disposed of by the Chief Justice and the Court LeadersNature of Complaints2016 Total
Judicial / Statutory DecisionJudicial ConductBoth Judicial / Statutory Decision and Judicial ConductDissatisfaction with the Court Leader’s handling and / or findings of the original complaints
Chief Justice40059
Chief Judge of the High Court2120NA23
Chief District Judge1016NA17
Chief Magistrate2134NA28
Sub-total56610577

Notes:
i.The total number of cases filed in 2016 is 478,141.
ii.Complaints related to judicial conduct can be broadly classified according to their nature. Among complaints on judicial conduct above, 5 cases are related to attitude and behavior in court, 5 cases are related to handling of actual proceedings in court, 1 case is related to conduct not directly related to court work and 5 cases are related to mixed nature.
iii.Among complaints not concerning judicial / statutory decisions above, there is one partially justified case relating to the conduct not directly related to court work. The complainant made four allegations against a Magistrate: (i) The Magistrate allowed the private painting teacher for prolonged free parking at a court building. (ii) The Magistrate allowed the private painting teacher to give lessons at the chamber of court, which involved the usage of government resources (water and electricity). (iii) The Magistrate occupied all the washrooms at a floor of the court building and did not allow other staff to use them. (iv) The Magistrate bought a number of shredders with public funds and the reasons for which were unknown. The Court Leader found that the Magistrate did arrange the painting teacher parked a car at the courts building once every week for a short period when the teacher came to give private lessons during lunch hour. On the use of car parking facilities, although the Magistrate has notified the venue manager of the above arrangement, the Court Leader advised the Magistrate that that was inappropriate, and that all judges and judicial officers should display propriety in all matters of conduct, both in and out of court. The Magistrate accepted the advice. The car parking by the painting teacher has ceased. As regards the allegations concerning the use of toilet facilities, this was not justified and untrue. As regards paper shredders, it was noted that two additional shredders were ordered and placed at different locations of the court building for use by other Magistrates and staff.

back to top

Copyright and Disclaimer
back to top
Level Double-A conformance, W3C WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0