Caseload, Case Disposal and Waiting Time at Different Court Levels
Obscene Articles Tribunal
CASELOAD AND CASE DISPOSAL OF THE OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL
| Caseload | Disposal * | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
| Articles for determination | 0 | 9 073 | 21 081 | 0 | 9 073 | 21 081 |
| Articles for classification | 174 | 167 | 82 | 179 | 168 | 81 |
| Articles for review | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Articles for reconsideration | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 178 | 9 240 | 21 163 | 181 | 9 243 | 21 162 |
| * | Case disposal refers to those articles which have been determined or classified; those in respect of which determination or classification is not required with consent of both parties; and those in respect of which determination or classification has been reviewed or reconsidered |
AVERAGE WAITING TIME FOR CASES IN THE OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL
| Average Waiting Time (days) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 |
|
| From referral by a magistrate to determination | 21 | -# | 22 | 15 |
| From receipt of application to classification | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| From receipt of application to review | 35 | 29 | -^ | -^ |
| From receipt of application to reconsideration | 35 | -* | -* | -* |
| # | As there is no application for determination filed, the waiting time is inapplicable |
| ^ | As there is no application for review filed, the waiting time is inapplicable |
| * | As there is no application for reconsideration filed, the waiting time is inapplicable |
Last Update Date : 26-02-2020