|
Caseload, Case Disposal and Waiting Time at Different Court Levels
Obscene Articles Tribunal
CASELOAD AND CASE DISPOSAL OF THE OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL
| | | Caseload | Disposal* |
| | | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
| - | Articles for determination
| 12 746 | 37 677 | 27 159 | 13 894 | 36 191 | 28 645 |
| - | Articles for classification
| 761 | 671 | 737 | 762 | 671 | 733 |
| - | Articles for review
| 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| - | Articles for reconsideration
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| | Total | 13 507 | 38 350 | 27 903 | 14 656 | 36 864 | 29 385 |
| * | Case disposal refers to those
articles which have been determined or classified;
those in respect of which determination or classification
is not required with consent of both parties; and
those in respect of which determination or classification
has been reviewed or reconsidered |
AVERAGE WAITING TIME
FOR CASES IN THE OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL
| | | Average Waiting
Time (days) |
| | | Target | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
| - | From referral by a magistrate to determination
|
21
| 18 | 20 | 21 |
| - | From receipt of application to classification
|
5
| 2 | 3 | 3 |
| - | From receipt of application to review
|
35
| -# | 26 | 23 |
| - | From receipt of application to reconsideration
|
35
| - *
| - *
| 24 |
|
| # | | As there is no application for review filed, the waiting time is inapplicable |
| * | | As there is no application for reconsideration filed, the waiting time is inapplicable |
|