|
Overall picture on caseload and disposal at all Court levels
Obscene Articles Tribunal
CASELOAD AND CASE DISPOSAL OF THE OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL
| |
|
Caseload |
Disposal* |
| |
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
| - |
Articles for determination
|
43 533 |
12 746 |
37 677 |
42 404 |
13 894 |
36 191 |
| - |
Articles for classification
|
931 |
761 |
671 |
933 |
762 |
671 |
| - |
Articles for review
|
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
| - |
Articles for reconsideration
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
Total |
44 466 |
13 507 |
38 350 |
43 339 |
14 656 |
36 864 |
| * |
Case disposal refers to those articles which have been determined or classified; those in respect of which determination or classification is not required with consent of both parties; and those in respect of which determination or classification have been reviewed or reconsidered |
WAITING TIME FOR CASES IN THE OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL
| |
|
Waiting Time (days) |
| |
|
Target |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
| - |
From referral by a magistrate to commencement of determination of the subject matter of a court case
|
21 |
18 |
18 |
20 |
| - |
From receipt of application to classification
|
5 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
| - |
From receipt of application to review
|
35 |
19 |
-# |
26 |
| - |
From receipt of application to reconsideration
|
35 |
- * |
- * |
- * |
|
|
# |
|
As there is no application for review filed, the waiting time is inapplicable |
|
* |
|
As there is no application for reconsideration filed, the waiting time is inapplicable |
|