|
Caseload, Case Disposal and Waiting Time at Different Court Levels
Obscene Articles Tribunal
CASELOAD AND CASE DISPOSAL OF THE OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL
| | | Caseload | Disposal* |
| | | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
| - | Articles for determination
| 3 459 | 0 | 0 | 3 459 | 0 | 0 |
| - | Articles for classification
| 819 | 226 | 174 | 823 | 222 | 179 |
| - | Articles for review
| 5 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| - | Articles for reconsideration
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | Total | 4 283 | 226 | 178 | 4 287 | 222 | 181 |
| * | Case disposal refers to those
articles which have been determined or classified;
those in respect of which determination or classification
is not required with consent of both parties; and
those in respect of which determination or classification
has been reviewed or reconsidered |
AVERAGE WAITING TIME
FOR CASES IN THE OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL
| | | Average Waiting
Time (days) |
| | | Target | 2015 | 2016 | 2017
|
| - | From referral by a magistrate to determination
|
21
| 18 | -# | -# |
| - | From receipt of application to classification
|
5
| 4 | 3 | 3 |
| - | From receipt of application to review
|
35
| 41 | -^ | 29 |
| - | From receipt of application to reconsideration
|
35
| - *
| - *
| - *
|
| # | | As there is no application for determination filed, the waiting time is inapplicable |
| ^ | | As there is no application for review filed, the waiting time is inapplicable |
| * | | As there is no application for reconsideration filed, the waiting time is inapplicable |
|